Is it time to abandon MMEX due the evergreen balance issues?

General discussion on all other topics under the sun.

Moderator: Renato

Post Reply
DaleVa
New User
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:02 am
Are you a spam bot?: No
Contact:

Is it time to abandon MMEX due the evergreen balance issues?

Post by DaleVa »

For well over a year there has been an issue where you cannot reconcile against a bank statement due to incorrect balances, or balance values that belong on another line. This has traversed a number of versions, and much talk in the forum regarding SN sorting, balance sorting etc. In the most recent version, 1.9.2 there is a default setting under Settings|Transactions called Sort Date identically to Sequence Number (SN). But balances are still wrong. Sorting, resorting, optimizing database, etc., etc., etc..
Seems to me that every thread is closed because it's a known issue but several releases later the issue persists.
It's the beginning of a new year, for most a year end and a chance for a fresh start. MMEX now has worthy competition in the open source mutli-OS window.
If I'm missing something that fixes this issue please share.

DaleVa
User avatar
Renato
MVP User
Posts: 893
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:36 pm
Are you a spam bot?: No
Location: near Zurich
Contact:

Re: Is it time to abandon MMEX due the evergreen balance issues?

Post by Renato »

Renato Forum Administrator (I'm not a developer)
frankieorabona
Super User
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:15 am
Are you a spam bot?: No
Location: Italia
Contact:

Re: Is it time to abandon MMEX due the evergreen balance issues?

Post by frankieorabona »

DaleVa wrote: Sat Jan 24, 2026 9:13 pm For well over a year there has been an issue where you cannot reconcile against a bank statement due to incorrect balances, or balance values that belong on another line. This has traversed a number of versions, and much talk in the forum regarding SN sorting, balance sorting etc. In the most recent version, 1.9.2 there is a default setting under Settings|Transactions called Sort Date identically to Sequence Number (SN). But balances are still wrong. Sorting, resorting, optimizing database, etc., etc., etc..
Seems to me that every thread is closed because it's a known issue but several releases later the issue persists.
It's the beginning of a new year, for most a year end and a chance for a fresh start. MMEX now has worthy competition in the open source mutli-OS window.
If I'm missing something that fixes this issue please share.

DaleVa
Hi DaleVa,
the most explicit and up-to-date explanation about how balances work in MMEX is this one:
https://moneymanagerex.org/blog/how-to- ... nt-panels/

Since version 1.9.2, balances are only reliable when the transaction order matches the logical execution order. For this reason, there is a setting under Settings → Transactions called “Sort date identically to Sequence Number (SN)”. When this option is enabled, transactions must be ordered by SN or by Date (Date and SN effectively become equivalent).

If transactions are sorted using any other criteria (payee, amount, category, etc.), the running balance becomes unreliable and therefore is not shown correctly. This behavior is intentional and was introduced to avoid displaying misleading balances, which could happen in older versions when transactions were viewed out of sequence.

So this is not really an unresolved balance bug, but a design change starting from 1.9.2 to enforce consistency between transaction order and balance calculation. Once the setting is enabled and sorting is aligned with Date or SN, balances and reconciliation should behave as expected.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests